All posts by Henry Brewer

Graphic Scores and Improvisation

In one of our first sessions, we looked at graphic scores and how they have been used in experimental music and sound art. I had never previously heard of graphic scores before and as someone who has always struggled to read and play music in the traditional notated form (my first instrument was guitar, which is very rarely read from traditional notation), I found the concept very interesting and wanted to research into the concept a little more.

The first example of modern graphical notation is Morton Feldman’s ‘Projection 1″ from 1950. This graphic score looks almost like a circuit diagram, and is designed to be played consistently quiet, with different boxes in the score representing “instrument, register, number of simultaneous sounds, mode of production, and duration” according to Paul Griffiths in his book ‘Modern Music and After: Directions Since 1945’. Time is represented by space, and the arrangement is certainly very sparse, which is of course not uncommon as Feldman was mostly a minimalist composer. I find it interesting and and of course very innovative, but I’m not sure it’s something I would find myself listening to very often as because it is so minimal my mind starts to wander a little bit (although this probably more on me than the piece).

Morton Feldman ‘Projection 1’
Graphic score for ‘Projection 1’

Another example of graphical notation is Brian Eno’s score for his 1978 album ‘Music for Airports’. Himself not being a traditionally trained musician, and struggling with traditional notation in the way that I also do, he once said in an interview “quite a lot of what I do has to do with sound texture, and you can’t notate that anyway… That’s because musical notation arose when sound textures were limited”. The score features very unorthodox instructions such as “play the note C every 21 seconds”, a method which I personally really like as it gives the musicians playing it a lot of freedom. Each track on the album has a different score with very different illustrations and patterns. Track ‘1/1’ is made up of lines and dots, whereas ‘2/2’ consists of grey rectangular blocks.

I think this way of working really speaks to me and is something I would be interested in working on in the future, although I should maybe brush up on my drawing skills a bit! The album is very calming and was composed with the purpose of being played in airports in mind, to make the atmosphere more calm and to be easily interruptible without it ruining the music. Although before looking into graphic notation I was a big fan of Eno’s work with David Bowie and Roxy Music, I had never listened to his ambient solo works before. I thoroughly enjoyed this album and will listen through his catalogue more in weeks to come.

‘Music for Airports’
Graphic score for ‘Music for Airports’

There are, however, older examples of composers trying to break free from traditional forms of notation. On designer David Hall’s website, I found an example of Beethoven’s Piano Sonata No.32, in which you can clearly see Beethoven deviating from the normal way of notating music at the time:

Beethoven Piano Sonata No.32

All in all, I find graphic scores to be a much more exciting, creative way of notating music and I would like to experiment with it in the future. As my drawing skills aren’t too great, perhaps I could use a picture that I’ve taken as my score, or use AI to generate the art and then improvise off of that. Who knows where the future will take me…

Bibliography

  1. David Hall. 2018. The art of visualising music: a brief history of graphic notation. [online] Available at: <http://davidhall.io/visualising-music-graphic-scores/> [Accessed 29 April 2022].
  2. Griffiths, P., 2002. Modern Music and After: Directions Since 1945. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p.94.
  3. Reverb Machine. 2019. Deconstructing Brian Eno’s “Music For Airports” | Reverb Machine. [online] Available at: <https://reverbmachine.com/blog/deconstructing-brian-eno-music-for-airports/> [Accessed 29 April 2022].

Starting my Piece – Ideas for Where it May Go

When starting my piece for this project I wasn’t quite sure what direction I wanted to take it. I’d gone to the seaside to record the change coming out of slot machines, but I hadn’t properly recorded it with an idea of what I wanted to do with it. Originally I thought that I could try and do something rhythmic with all the different recordings but in practice I found it very difficult and decided I needed to change what I was doing. Seeing as the theme of the piece didn’t have to be ‘change’ anymore, I just decided to put a few of the field recordings into my DAW and see what I felt like making.

I started by looping the 18 second sound clip that I included in one of my recent blog posts and used it as a sort of background soundscape to open up with. I put a few plug-ins onto the track to enhance the track a little bit. I added a stereo spread and sample delay to help spread the track across the stereo field, and a short room reverb (I’m not entirely sure why I did this but I felt as though it made the track sound a little better).

Sample Delay settings for the background track
Stereo Spread settings for the background track
Reverb settings for the background track

I then used a technique that I had used in a previous project – I looped the sound effect of coins dropping that I previously posted on this blog, to make it sound as if it was never ending and the coins never stop dropping. I did this previously in my first project where I made it sound as though a door would not stop creaking open for 2 minutes. I find that if used effectively, this can definitely create a sense of unease in the listener as normally you would not hear that sound continuing for that amount of time – you usually only hear coins dropping from a machine or a door creaking for a couple of seconds at a time.

Looped sections of the coins dropping

Already from having these two tracks put together, with all of their overwhelming noises, I figured out that I could make a disturbing piece of sound art that relates to my social anxiety when I am in public spaces. It would be an interesting concept to make something that is purposefully unpleasant to listen to, as I feel like that is one of the only ways to make an audience understand truly how horrible anxiety can be at times. To listen to it and just feel overwhelmed and want it to be over is a very uncommon reaction to want to get from an audience, but I feel as though it could be an interesting experiment.

I tried to add a couple more field recordings from the arcade but it ended up not sounding great and decided it was time to add some new textures.

A field recording from Hastings that I ended up not using

I found an experimental synth preset on my DAW called ‘Old Robot Factory’ which was very percussive and eerie sounding. I changed some of the settings and added an EQ and some stereo spread and this is the result I got:

‘Old Robot Factory’ Drums

At the moment I’m keeping it quite low in the mix, as having it too high does make it feel a bit like a horror/sci-fi track from the mid 20th century. However, if you have it quieter it just adds to a general feeling of unease.

The last thing I’ve added so far to cause a big sense of anxiety is a high pitched, distorted laugh that sort of sounds like a deranged child-demon mocking the listener. Here is the original piece of audio that I recorded, without any plugins:

As you can hear, it doesn’t sound particularly amazing. In order to fix this I added a vocal transformer, chorus, EQ, reverb, heavy compression and distortion. Here is the end result:

I’m not sure how I feel about this sound at the moment but I’m going to stick with it for now and see where the piece takes me. I think it definitely adds to the piece feeling very overwhelming, so in that sense it does work but I’m not sure if it maybe comes across too gimmicky.

Vocal Transformer for laughter track
Chorus for laughter track
Reverb for laughter track
Compressor for laughter track
Distortion for laughter track

This is as far as I am with the piece so far, and I will update the blog as I go along. I think I’m happy with the direction I’m taking, although if I had more time I would probably start off a few pieces and see which one I think is best.

Hyperacusis

In our psychcoacoustics lecture a few weeks ago, I came across a condition that I had never heard of before – Hyperacusis.

What is Hyperacusis?

According to the NHS website, “Hyperacusis is when everyday sounds seem much louder than they should”. It sometimes appears on its own but can also be caused by other conditions such as tinnitus (constant ringing of the ears), migraines and Lyme disease, amongst others.

The NHS website also states that sounds that can affect people with the condition include “jingling coins, a barking dog, a car engine, someone chewing or a vacuum cleaner”. Seeing as I just went to Hastings to record jingling coins (the first sound that NHS lists as causing difficulties), I wanted to research this condition more and find out how it affects people who have it.

Table by South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust showing the differences between Hyperacusis and other similar conditions such as Phonophobia and Misophonia.

How does it affect people in day-to-day life?

It’s all well and good reading about the condition and grasping how it might affect people, but for my research I wanted to find actual case studies of people who suffer from hyperacusis and see how it really impacts their day-to-day lives. I found an ABC interview from 2014 with Joyce Cohen and Ben Meltzer (https://abcnews.go.com/Health/quest-silence-living-wth-hyperacusis/story?id=22284805), a couple from New York who both suffer from an extreme form of the condition. The interviewer follows Cohen around the streets of New York, and it becomes apparent just how much this condition can affect people. Cohen walks around with industry grade ear protection over her head, which she only takes off “if I’m out in my block in the middle of the night…But typically, it’s too hazardous”.

Seemingly innocent noises such as a doorman blowing a whistle have an incredibly strong affect on Cohen – she describes the sensation as her “ears being filled with burning acid”. Matters are even worse for her husband, Ben Meltzer, who hasn’t been able to leave his apartment for years due to his condition. In fact, the only time he has left his apartment recently is for the interview, and even then the team has to take extra special precautions to accommodate him, such as removing all jewellery and footwear, and switching their phones to silent. Even when they are 29 stories above street level, they still have to briefly stop the interview when vehicle with a siren drives past the building on ground level.

In other cases hyperacusis has had an even more serious effect on those who are unlucky enough to develop it. A few years ago two young musicians who were seriously affected by the condition tragically committed suicide. Meltzer has since set up an online support group, Hyperacusis Ear Pain, in memory of the two.

What can be done to cure it?

Unfortunately, there is no specific medical treatment to help cure hyperacusis. However, there are certain therapies that have proven useful for some who suffer from the condition. CBT (Cognitive Behavioural Therapy), according to the British Tinnitus Assocation, is used to “recognise what is helpful and/or unhelpful in your everyday life when it comes to living with hyperacusis”. The therapist that works with the patient then tries to help find ways to manage the condition and reduce the impact it has on day-today activities.

There is also more specific therapy that is occasionally used for the condition, often delivered by therapists that also work with conditions such as tinnitus. They will usually work with the patient to gradually introduce aspects of noise into their life in a process known as sound therapy. The patient will be given a small device that plays quiet amounts of background noise, which is often something similar to white noise. They monitor how this affects the patient and then continue from that point as required. In a lot of cases this will be successful however there have definitely been cases where this hasn’t worked and the patient has kept suffering from the symptoms.

Bibiliography

  1. nhs.uk. 2019. Noise sensitivity (hyperacusis). [online] Available at: <https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/hyperacusis/> [Accessed 29 April 2022].
  2. Deutsch, G., 2014. On the Quest for Silence: Living With Hyperacusis. [online] ABC News. Available at: <https://abcnews.go.com/Health/quest-silence-living-wth-hyperacusis/story?id=22284805> [Accessed 29 April 2022].
  3. ENT Health. 2019. Hyperacusis – ENT Health. [online] Available at: <https://www.enthealth.org/conditions/hyperacusis/#:~:text=There%20are%20no%20specific%20surgical,affected%20ear%2C%20or%20both%20ears.> [Accessed 29 April 2022].
  4. Baguley, D. and McFerran, D., 2019. Hyperacusis. [online] British Tinnitus Association. Available at: <https://www.tinnitus.org.uk/hyperacusis> [Accessed 29 April 2022].
  5. Swft.nhs.uk. n.d. Hyperacusis information for audiology patients at Warwick Hospital. [online] Available at: <https://www.swft.nhs.uk/our-services/adult-hospital-services/audiology-hearing/hyperacusis> [Accessed 29 April 2022].

A Day out to Hastings

When we initially started this project, we were given the theme of ‘Change’. Although the theme eventually did end up changing to be whatever we wanted to take a piece about, I decided to stick with the original brief and record some change coming out of slot machines in an arcade, taking the brief rather literally (this was also a brilliant excuse to have a nice day out at the seaside which I rather enjoyed!)

As it was quite a last minute idea for me to go on the trip, I didn’t have time to take out a Zoom portable recorder so I had to record everything on my phone. I was initially very sceptical of this but decided to just press ahead anyway, and I found that I was quite happy with the results. Whilst I don’t think they were up to the same standard as a more professional recording device, I think that within a mix they would sound good enough to use.

Below are a couple of examples of recordings I made.

I think that the first, longer one could be used as a general background soundscape, although it is quite low quality. The second clip would sound great and I actually practiced using a noise gate and EQ to cut out all of the background noise and I think I now have a very usable piece of audio that can be placed over other clips to hide the small amount of noise that is still there:

Noise Gate settings for the clip
EQ Settings for the clip

I also saw a couple of really creepy looking arcade games that inspired me to maybe make something a little spooky:

AM/FM Radio – What’s The Difference?

For my final blog entry, I want to explore the difference between AM/FM radio because, quite embarrassingly, before writing this blog I really didn’t know the difference between the two!

AM Radio

AM (or Amplitude Modulation) radio is the original format used for broadcast from c.1900 onward. Like FM Radio, AM needs to be transmitted through a carrier wave, and the primary difference between the two is in how this is done. With AM, the information is transmitted via variations of amplitude (volume/strength) within the carrier wave. AM can often be prone to more static than FM.

Although AM radio is the original format for broadcast, it has been quite unpopular for around 70 years. This is due to FM Radio and TV superseding its place.

FM Radio

FM (or Frequency Modulation) radio is a more recent invention than AM, having been invented in 1933 by American engineer Edwin Armstrong. FM broadcast is far higher quality than AM, and is much more popular today because of this. Similar to AM radio, FM also needs to transmit information through a carrier wave, however with FM it is the carrier wave frequency that is altered, instead of the amplitude.

A more visual representation of the differences between AM and FM waves

Due to FM’s higher audio quality it is the industry standard for broadcast at the moment, and has been so for decades. However, that is not to say that AM doesn’t have its advantages. AM equipment is a lot less complex and has a lower bandwith than FM, meaning that it is comparatively easier to receive an AM signal and there are usually more stations availably within any given frequency range.

However, FM is generally accepted as being superior to AM for public broadcast, and is usually a better method for when it comes to transmitting music or radio art broadcasts.

Bibliography

  1. Midland Radio. 2021. What Do AM and FM Stand For? A Quick Guide. [online] Available at: <https://midlandusa.com/blogs/blog/what-do-am-and-fm-stand-for-a-quick-guide> [Accessed 5 February 2022].
  2. Seamount, C., 2022. Applications of Electromagnetic Waves: Radio Waves. [online] Ffden-2.phys.uaf.edu. Available at: <http://ffden-2.phys.uaf.edu/webproj/213_fall_2017/Christopher_Seamount/page4.html> [Accessed 5 February 2022].

History of Radio

For this blog post, I thought I would take a brief look at the history of radio.

There is some debate about who first invented the radio – the two main contenders are Nikola Tesla and Guglielmo Marconi. In 1893, Tesla first demonstrated the wireless radio in St. Louis. However, Marconi was the first wireless telegraphy patent in England in 1896, and in 1901 was the first person to transmit signals across the Atlantic Ocean.

Guglielmo Marconi

Originally, the main use of radio was to contact ships at sea from land and morse code was typically used due to radio signals not being very clear at the time. It was invaluable in the First World War and was used to deliver messages to armed forces.

Between the wars, civilians started to purchase radios for their own use, and in 1922 the BBC began broadcasting (Fun fact – I sampled a part of their broadcast in a song I made a few years ago!) and by 1926 started to gain in popularity, partly in reaction to the newspaper strike that same year. Radio at this time was primarily broadcasting the news and serial dramas.

After the Second World War, where it again proved itself invaluable, there was a shift towards playing popular music and the idea of the Top 40 began to rear its head. The target demographic for popular music programmes was generally young teens to adults in their mid-30s.

In the 1960’s, pirate radio began to emerge in Britain. Due to the BBC refusing to play certain records, a new generation of youngsters decided to take matters into their own hands. There were many stations, the most famous of which was Radio Caroline, that broadcasted off boats in international waters to avoid authorities. At the height of their reign they were broadcasting American Rock n’ Roll records to over 10 million listeners a day!

Right now radio is a very diverse landscape, with all types of programming ranging from traditional top 40 countdowns to phone in radio stations where listeners can talk to presenters live on air.

And what about the future of radio? Well, as discussed in my previous article, that remains to be seen.

Bibliography

  1. Wood, J., n.d. History of the Radio: A Complete Radio Timeline. [online] Techwholesale.com. Available at: <https://www.techwholesale.com/history-of-the-radio.html> [Accessed 4 February 2022].
  2. Kiger, P., 2020. How Pirate Radio Rocked the 1960s Airwaves and Still Exists Today. [online] HowStuffWorks. Available at: <https://history.howstuffworks.com/historical-events/pirate-radio.htm> [Accessed 4 February 2022].

Is Radio a Dying Art Form?

The argument is certainly there – people, especially younger consumers, want to stream content they choose to listen to now rather than having it curated and decided for them by radio stations and DJs.

According to a study by Larry Miller, director of New York University’s Steinhardt Music Business program, there are many threats facing radio at the moment. These include, but are not limited to:

  • Digital services severely crowding traditional AM/FM radio
  • Younger listeners instead seeking out new content through the likes of YouTube and Spotify, especially now that Spotify also hosts podcasts
  • Car makers marginalising radio on their dashboards (this is important as cars used to be a very popular setting for people to listen to the radio)
  • Smart speakers shaping people’s demands and making them less likely to choose the radio over Spotify, podcasts, etc.

It’s hard to argue with these concerns. As humans, we are moving towards a more on-demand based culture, something which radio (and traditional television) have failed to keep up with. Maybe the future is in podcasts, where episodes can be any length and are not subject to as many strict regulations.

However, this may not necessarily be the case. Maybe all radio needs to do is adapt, to not simply view itself as a distribution service but to view itself as a form of content. This is an argument that Mixcloud’s Ben Lawrence and BBC Radio 1’s Kate Holder made at a panel on the future of radio at the FastForward conference in Amsterdam in 2017.

“Looking at streaming as a competitor, in terms of taking people’s time, absolutely it is (a challenge)… but actually, in terms of the concept of a streaming service, I don’t necessarily see it 100% as a competitive thing. Audiences use them in different ways… Radio’s appeal is you can stumble across things that you wouldn’t hear otherwise. Hopefully people will hear bands they love, and then they’ll go and look for them on streaming services” said Holder.

Lawrence argued that “In the future people won’t be listening at all in FM or AM, or DAB. If you think about how radio is distributed through that media at the moment, it’s a lot in-car and a lot at home… Streaming is only really a threat to incumbents if they don’t see it as the feature. if they try and silo themselves and say ‘we’re radio, we don’t really do streaming’…”.

I agree with these arguments somewhat. I think that if radio stations manage to adapt to audiences new methods of consuming content, they will do rather well for themselves. Podcasts are certainly evidence of this. As well as this, listening to live radio is still an engaging and pleasurable activity. When I’m driving my car, I like to stick on the radio as I find it more interesting to hear new content than to stick on the same CD I’ve heard tens of times before when I wasn’t driving (although maybe this is a sign of the antiquated audio system in my car, as I still can’t plug my phone in through an auxiliary cable).

I think that yes, the traditional format of radio is losing its appeal in popularity. However, this doesn’t mean radio as an art form has to!

Bibliography

  1. Sanchez, D., 2017. Radio Is Dead In 10 Years. This Study Proves It.. [online] Digital Music News. Available at: <https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2017/08/31/radio-dead-musonomics-study/> [Accessed 4 February 2022].
  2. Dredge, S., 2017. ‘People say radio is dead. Actually, radio as content is exploding…’ – Music Ally. [online] Musically.com. Available at: <https://musically.com/2017/02/23/radio-dead-content-exploding/> [Accessed 4 February 2022].

War of the Worlds

October 30th, 1938.

The date of one of the most infamous radio broadcasts of all time, still talked about 84 years later. This is of course Orson Welles’ reading of H.G. Welles’ classic, ‘The War of the Worlds’. This broadcast is well documented for having caused widespread panic (although the extent of this is heavily disputed) due to the first act’s news bulletin-style presentation.

I wanted to listen to this broadcast as although it is very well known I have never actually heard it, and thought it would be interesting to analyse the use of sound.

I think the most innovative use of sound in this story is the flip-flopping between a concert in “the Meridian Room in the Hotel Park Plaza in Downtown New York” and the news bulletins of Martians coming down to invade Earth. If the listener had not tuned in right from the start of the broadcast, or had simply not been paying attention for a few minutes, then there would be nothing to indicate in the story that this was fiction, especially seeing as there wasn’t a break in the programme until 38 minutes in, well after a large portion of New Jersey and New York had been vaporised by Martian heat rays. I think this is an excellent plot time and incredibly forward thinking for the time as it is quite a non-traditional way of telling a story. It’s certainly better than the awful 1977 musical version of the same story by Jeff Wayne. I was subjected to that once. Never again.

Bibliography

  1. Schwartz, A., 2015. The Infamous “War of the Worlds” Radio Broadcast Was a Magnificent Fluke. [online] Smithsonian Magazine. Available at: <https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/infamous-war-worlds-radio-broadcast-was-magnificent-fluke-180955180/> [Accessed 3 February 2022].
  2. HISTORY. 2009. Orson Welles’s “War of the Worlds” radio play is broadcast. [online] Available at: <https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/welles-scares-nation> [Accessed 3 February 2022].

The Archers: A case study of tropes in radio

The Archers is the world’s longest running drama, with almost 20,000 episodes and was first broadcast on 1st January 1951.

It’s also something I remember from my childhood – in a slightly strange way though. I remember in my formative years thinking that The Archers was simply the ‘Barwick Green’ maypole dance that is used as the theme tune for the show. I used to be really excited to hear it whenever my mum would turn the radio on at 7pm, 5 days a week. For some reason I thought that the radio drama that followed was something completely different and was of no interest to me at all.

I decided to revisit this artefact of my childhood for this unit, and this time actually pay attention to the story and the techniques used that differentiate from television, a format that I am much more familiar with. I decided to examine this particular broadcast from the 31st of January 2022:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m0013zj8

At first I found it hard to adjust, as I haven’t actually listened to a radio drama for quite some time. The first and most obvious difference I noticed was that the characters always refer to each other by their names, often multiple times within a scene. This is obviously because listeners aren’t going to be able to see who the characters are, and a lot of them have similar voices. Also, listeners may be drifting in and out of the story as the radio could be on in the background so it’s important to reiterate who is in which scene.

I actually found that compared to what I was expecting, there were relatively few sound effects in this episode. This might have been because of the laid back, rural nature of the programme as there were only really a couple of soundscapes that were quite low in the mix, and there was one instance of a telephone eq being used. Other than that, the use of sound effects was fairly sparse. I think for my next post I will try to find something a little more engaging.